Senator Tim Larson: “We must act and act swiftly in a way that truly creates a solution to crumbling concrete foundations”

Senator Tim Larson: “We must act and act swiftly in a way that truly creates a solution to crumbling concrete foundations”

Senate Senator Tim Larson (D-East Hartford) today submitted the following testimony to the Public Safety and Security, Insurance and Real Estate, and Planning and Development Committees in support of a bill he authored to help homeowners address crumbling concrete foundations in eastern Connecticut:

As a state senator representing the 3rd District including East Hartford, East Windsor, Ellington and South Windsor, I am here to support S.B. 806, An Act Allowing Municipalities to Establish a Grant Program to Replace or Repair Crumbling Concrete Foundations.

This situation has been completely devastating as anyone can imagine, having their largest, single asset literally fall apart beneath them without any recourse whatsoever other than remortgaging their home, essentially paying for it twice. That is not only impractical, but in many cases impossible.

My proposed bill, S.B. 806, would simply give municipalities an option and ability to use bond funds to grant aid to residents who are affected by this horrific situation through no fault of their own.

I am not proposing an unfunded mandate. Towns’ grand lists may have been affected to varying degrees by the number of failing foundations. This gives individual towns the ability to be part of the solution, and to assist their residents grappling with this crisis.

Under this legislation, it would be Voluntary for Municipalities to choose to use this mechanism, and in so choosing, they could decide to use their own formula. For example, they may grant the entire amount of damages or some percentage thereof to in order to make their residents whole.

This issue is too large for any one group of residents who have fallen victim to crumbling concrete to handle entirely on their own. Yes, homeowners must contribute to the solution in some way. But it is up to the towns that collect property taxes and where grand lists stand to be decimated to step up to the plate and help their neighbors.

However, I firmly believe that any real and viable solution will need to be a coalition of partners including residents. Everyone must have some “skin in the game” by virtue of some percentage of the total claim for the repair.

Having the individual towns as a part of this resolution would allow residents to come forward and work on a solution and it would encourage them to hold contractors accountable and ensure costs are contained throughout the repair process.

Additionally, I would suggest that towns could use local assessor’s offices, as well as local building officials, to monitor the progress for their individual residents.

There has been money highlighted by the Attorney General’s office. That funding could be used to help local towns recoup some of the cost and pay off the bonding to repair the homes.

These funds could be used as offsets for individual town’s designated programs. Since this problem could take years to unfold and to rectify, towns could reduce exposure by repeating this process on a rolling basis.

It is up to the banks that hold mortgages on these homes to contribute to the solution so that people don’t walk away from a house that cannot be sold until it is repaired anyway.

It is up to insurance companies and carriers to do right by their customers even if they are not strictly required to due to changes in 1991 to the regulations around peril of collapse.

And it is up to the state and federal government to find programs and existing funding streams to back-fill local towns that do what I believe to be the right thing by making use of the mechanism this bill would put in place to begin the process of repair.

This problem is bigger than eastern Connecticut and the thousands of homes that have been and will be impacted by this. The entire state’s real estate market stands to be impacted by this crisis, and we must act and act swiftly in a way that truly creates a solution without further harming those who have already lost so much.

I look forward to assisting my colleagues in any way I can for a solution for homeowners in Connecticut.

Senator Cathy Osten: Protecting constituents with crumbling concrete “our duty and obligation”

Senator Cathy Osten: Protecting constituents with crumbling concrete “our duty and obligation”

Photo of Osten testifying on crumbling concrete.

Sen. Osten submits testimony in support of three bills to assist residents struggling with crumbling concrete foundations.

State Senator Cathy Osten (D-Sprague) today submitted the following testimony in support of three bills to address crumbling concrete foundations before a joint hearing of the Public Safety and Security, Insurance and Real Estate, and Planning and Development Committees:

To the Honorable Chairs and distinguished members of the Public Safety and Security, Insurance and Real Estate, Planning and Development, and Banking Committees, thank you for holding this critically important public hearing. I am here to testify in support of Senate Bill 794, Senate Bill 905 and House Bill 7175.

My name is Cathy Osten and I represent the 19th Senate District, which includes the towns of Columbia, Franklin, Hebron, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Marlborough, Montville, Norwich, and Sprague.

Failing concrete foundations caused by the mineral pyrrhotite have been identified in homes across North Central and Eastern Connecticut. This tragic and unforeseen disaster has affected hundreds of families. Those homeowners, who are already living in homes that have been affected, are devastated, both emotionally and financially.

I wholeheartedly support Senate Bill 794, An Act Assisting Homeowners with Crumbing Foundations. This bill would establish the administrative mechanism necessary to allow cities and towns to borrow the funds needed to address affected homes. Combined with the $5 million already set aside to help pay the interest on these loans, I believe there must be a grant component to this fund which could be means tested as part of this overall process.

Senate Bill 905, An Act Concerning Failing Concrete Foundations, will allow the Department of Consumer Protection to establish a program in order to aid the owners of these residential and commercial buildings with the failing concrete foundations.

Lastly, I support House Bill 7175, An Act Requiring the Testing of Concrete Aggregate for the Presence of Pyrrhotite. Testing for the presence of this mineral will ensure that what has happened to these families WILL NEVER happen again. This is imperative for upholding a strong and healthy housing market in Connecticut.

I believe it is our duty and obligation to protect our constituents, who pay property taxes on their family’s most important investments, their home. This legislation seeks to provide a mechanism to address those caught in an unfortunate situation, not of their making. It is essential that we work together to improve the quality of life for all affected by this issue and ensure that those affected will be made whole.

I also believe that a future funding mechanism must be developed as this has the potential to be a long term rollout of identified impacted structures.

Thank you again for the opportunity to testify in support of these measures. I look forward to working with the leadership and members of these committees on this important issue.

Sen. Fonfara: “It is essential that ConnDOT include the ‘Tunnel Option’ for further study”

Sen. Fonfara: “It is essential that ConnDOT include the ‘Tunnel Option’ for further study”

HARTFORD, CT— State Senator John Fonfara (D-Hartford) submitted the following written testimony to the Transportation Committee Monday in support of a bill that would see the State Department of Transportation study the construction of tunnels to alleviate traffic at the Interstate 84 and 91 interchange in Hartford:

Like many similar Interstate Highway interchanges of its era, Hartford’s I-84/I-91 interchange and viaduct are approaching the end of their useful life.

Fortuitously, CONDOT has undertaken a project which begins to grapple with the challenge of how best to replace this aging highway alignment and complex system of raised structures in ways that respond not only to transportation needs, but also to essential elements of urban design and economic development imperatives. As the “I-84/I-91 Interchange Study” examines alternative solutions to replace the Interchange, Hartford has an historic opportunity to renew its transportation infrastructure, remove a monumental Architectural barrier dividing the State’s Capital City, improve Hartford making it a more livable City, resolve a very real problem with the Hartford Levee System caused by the lowering of I-91 in the 1990’s and promote economic development around a renewed transportation Infrastructure that will serve the State and the Capital Region for the next Century.

It is essential that this Study embraces a bold 100-year solution that solves all the problems which have arisen due to inadequacies related to the current interchange. From the onset of this very large undertaking, it is our obligation to note that an under-engineered plan to upgrade the interchange was implemented in the 1990’s. That historic effort took years to complete, caused immeasurable losses to the motoring public in the form of traffic congestion and delays, cost $200M+ to complete and was opened to traffic in 1998. The bridges and highways included in that project were designed for a 75-year service life. Due to a total lack of vision and a wholly inadequate project design, we are already planning their replacement less than 20 years into that design life. With the current study and opportunity to correct these mistakes, we cannot once again misappropriate Public Funds to replicate a similar monumental miscalculation and lack of vision at the very same location.

To fully understand the current inadequacies one must consider the history as to how this flawed interchange evolved. When it was planned as an expressway in the 1940’s and 50’s it was envisioned that a comprehensive system of circumferential beltways would be built around the city to facilitate East-West and North-South through traffic destined for places other than Hartford. Subsequently, the system of beltways was only partially built, and is so deficient, that the I-84/I-91 interchange accommodates 275,000 vehicles per day. Approximately 40-50 percent of those trips are the result of through traffic with no Hartford destination, but no beltway to traverse around the City.

Revisiting the construction of a Beltway System around Hartford is no longer practical. The dedicated corridors have subsequently been developed or environmental regulations have been adopted that would preclude their use for highway purposes. Rebuilding I-84/I-91 interchange in place is simply not feasible due to the following:

  1. It would further amplify and refortify serious Environmental Justice Issues of a Divided City, which is inexplicable as is,
  2. It is impractical from a Constructability standpoint, due to insufficient underlying highway land to adequately widen both highways and build the required multi layered interchange,
  3. Widening the Bulkely Bridge would present serious environmental challenges pertaining to the Connecticut River and adjacent Wetlands,
  4. Widening of the Bulkely Bridge (the longest Stone Arch Structure in the United States) and altering the Charter Oak Bridge are enormously costly and would be very disruptive to local and through traffic for a long duration.

There is only one alternative which has the ability to separate the through traffic from Local traffic, drastically reducing the overland flow of traffic through the City . . . .that is placing the interstate highway approaches and the interchange within a tunnel.

This option would reduce the local traffic in both Hartford and East Hartford to volumes which could be easily handled on Urban Boulevards built on smaller footprints, at grade within the current Interstate Highway Right of Way and served by Signalized Intersections. No viaduct barriers, No interchanges, No exit ramps or No entrance ramps would be required to adequately design for the safe passage of local traffic on Urban Boulevards. Repurposing the Interstate Right of Ways would also provide adequate land to expand Express Bus Transit and Bicycle/Pedestrian oriented improvements all of which would help to transform Hartford and East Hartford into far more livable Cities. It is essential that CONDOT include the “Tunnel Option” for further study in the current Interchange alternatives analysis. When fully evaluated alongside the “Rebuild in Place Option” the CONDOT Study will prove the Tunnel concept to be a cost competitive more fully engineered solution.

With I-84/I-91 through traffic in tunnels, there is an opportunity to raise the grade along the land side of the Hartford Dike system adjacent to the existing Buckley Bridge Abutments. This simple alteration will assist in resolving a critical Corps of Engineer identified deficiency in the Hartford Flood Protection systems, for which there is alarmingly no current programmed improvement to repair.

The I-84 Viaduct is widely considered to be a major barrier occupying a wide swath of land that divides Hartford, separating neighborhoods from downtown and each other. The Viaduct crosses major arterial roadways such as Capitol Avenue and the Farmington Avenue/Asylum Avenue corridor, and other streets such as Sigourney Street, Broad Street and Laurel Street.

  • At Asylum Avenue, viaduct structures for road and rail pass over the street. When combined with the three closely spaced highway ramps that connect to Asylum Avenue the result is an unattractive “no man’s land” that has limited appeal as a pedestrian environment. Consequently, the highway creates a great divide between the major employment centers of Aetna and The Hartford with more than 10,000 employees and the nearby downtown core, limiting the potential synergies between these corporate campuses and the downtown as a whole.
  • At Broad Street, the Viaduct structure and associated access ramps create an inhospitable pedestrian environment between the highway and Farmington Avenue, making a walk from Asylum Hill to downtown or Frog Hollow a challenging experience.
  • At Sigourney Street, crossing the highway as a pedestrian is more appealing than at Asylum or Broad streets, but the combination of the overhead Viaduct, an elevated street over the rail line, and two highway access ramps creates its own challenges to establishing an appealing pedestrian experience.
  • Capitol Avenue, near the Sisson Avenue interchange, passes below multiple highway ramps and the rail line, creating a barrier between surrounding neighborhoods and downtown Hartford.
  • The Sisson Avenue ramps occupy an excessively large land area, having originally been designed to connect with a future highway to the north that was never constructed.
  • The Viaduct structure and its environmental impacts including noise and air quality have created an unappealing urban environment, that extends beyond the footprint of the highway.
  • As a result of these deficiencies much of the useable land situated around the Interstate Highways is grossly underutilized, serving primarily for surface parking lots.
  • The Viaduct structure is visually unappealing and in a state of poor repair.

The economic success of the Capital Region is largely dependent on its access and relationship to the metro centers of Boston and New York. From an inter-regional perspective, the I-84/I-91 interchange is a critical truck and auto corridor linking Hartford to the New York and Boston metro areas. From an intra-regional perspective, I-84 provides customer and employee access to downtown Hartford, St. Francis Hospital, and the corporate campuses of Travelers Insurance, The Aetna and The Hartford.

A key regional economic development objective for the Metro Hartford Region is to attract and retain young, highly skilled workers. A vital core, strong urban neighborhoods, transportation choices, and quality places are important factors to the young, discerning workforce. Because the Viaduct structure, the I-84 Interchange and associated ramps create an inhospitable pedestrian environment, they contribute to downtown’s negative image.

With proper planning, the reconstruction of the Interchange within a Tunnel can create an urban framework that successfully incorporates the Asylum/Farmington area(s) into the downtown district, unlocks transit- oriented development potential and revitalizes Downtown West.
Built in 1965, modernized in the late 1990’s, the current Interchange built on Viaducts is a massive elevated highway that simply cannot practically be rebuilt or modified to provide a contemporary transportation solution. Any effort to force that fit will most assuredly result in a replication of the failed 1990’s reconstruction plan.

The Tunneled option would create the long overdue, and originally contemplated though traffic bypass to the City, in the form of a free-flowing tunnel beneath Hartford. Providing the required relief and the essential safe passage of through vehicles with no intended destination in Hartford.

This I-84/I-92 highway Interchange is the state’s highest volume Intersection with daily traffic volumes of approximately 275,000 vehicles. We must separate the through traffic in a tunnel and rebuild boulevards to handle local traffic where elevated highways stand today. The proposed Tunnel and realigned urban scaled boulevards will better serve the City of Hartford Neighborhoods, the Capital Region, the State of Connecticut and the Interstate Motoring Public. Both can be implemented without shutting down the current systems to traffic which would cause irreparable harm to the State’s economy.

For these reasons the Tunnel Option must be considered in the Interchange Study currently being performed by CONDOT.

The economic future of the Capital Regional and the State of Connecticut are dependent on a fully engineered I-84/I-91 interchange solution with a 100-year vision.

Thank you for your attention and your thoughtful consideration.

Senator Winfield in the News: Criminal Justice on Connecticut Newsmakers

Senator Winfield on Connecticut Newsmakers

Issues facing Connecticut from criminal justice reform to body worn cameras
with Connecticut State Senator, Gary Winfield.

photo of Senator Winfield on CT Newsmakers.

Connecticut State Senator, Gary Winfield, representing the 10th District, joins Eric Clemons at Infinity Hall to discuss criminal justice reform, community policing, law enforcement training while interacting with individuals with mental illness and the adoption of body worn camera’s for the police force.

Watch the video.

Larson Welcomes Selection of East Windsor as Site for Third Casino

Larson Welcomes Selection of East Windsor as Site for Third Casino

State Senator Tim Larson (D-East Hartford) released the following statement in response to the announcement Monday that the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan Tribes have selected East Windsor as the site for the proposed entertainment and gaming facility in the Hartford region.

“I think this is great news for the town of East Windsor and the state as a whole,” said Sen. Larson.

Sen. Larson echoed the sentiments of Rodney Butler, chairman of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, who spoke about the importance of protecting Connecticut’s gaming industry early on in the process.

“It’s not that East Hartford or Hartford didn’t win the casino—Connecticut won the casino which will generate revenue, create and retain jobs and add to our tourism portfolio,” said Sen. Larson.

“I am glad to see the partnership that has been developed between the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan Tribes, two competitors who have come together on this critical project that will benefit our state and our residents.

“I’ve spoken with a lot of people who have had differing opinions on the third casino, and I believe the majority now see this as a real opportunity, and it seems very promising.”

Senate Majority Leader Duff: “Businesses need a transportation infrastructure that provides reliability and consistency in order to grow and succeed.”

Senate Majority Leader Duff: “Businesses need a transportation infrastructure that provides reliability and consistency in order to grow and succeed.”

Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) today submitted the following testimony to the Transportation Committee in support of an amendment to the State Constitution establishing a lockbox for transportation funds:

Senator Leone, Senator Boucher, Representative Guerrera, Representative Carney, and distinguished members of the Transportation Committee, I am submitting testimony in support of S.J. No. 5, Resolution Proposing an Amendment to the State Constitution Regarding the Special Transportation Fund. Thank you to the committee for holding a public hearing regarding this resolution.

As I know you are all aware, the General Assembly has been considering the creation of a transportation lockbox with a constitutional amendment for several years. I join with many of my colleagues in believing that creating such a lockbox is in the best interest of the fiscal health of Connecticut. A strong, modernized infrastructure is central to a thriving economy. When I speak with business leaders in Norwalk and Darien in my district and with others across the state, they repeatedly stress the need for an upgraded transportation system. Businesses need a transportation infrastructure that provides reliability and consistency in order to grow and succeed.

The purpose of a transportation lockbox is to ensure that funds intended to be used for transportation remain reserved for that use only. These purposes can be spending on transportation meant for public use or benefit, including but not limited to the payment of debt service on obligations incurred by the state for transportation purposes, road and bridge repair, and mass transit. Any monies placed in this protected fund are effectively sacrosanct and cannot be used for any purpose unrelated to transportation. The legislature will retain its appropriation authority under the state constitution to determine which monies and in what amount get placed into the fund in a particular fiscal year.

I would respectfully urge the Transportation Committee to pass this resolution. Under Article Twelve of our state constitution, this constitutional amendment would need the support and vote of three-fourths of the total membership of each house in order to be on the ballot for the voters’ consideration in November of 2018. I hope that we can work together to achieve that. This would be an important step in creating an efficient, dependable transportation infrastructure for our business community and for our state. Thank you for your time and for your consideration of S.J. 5.

Senator Hartley E-News: Growing Connecticut’s Bioscience Economy

Osten, Regional Job Leaders Testify in Support of Advanced Manufacturing Training Bill

Osten, Regional Job Leaders Testify in Support of Advanced Manufacturing Training Bill

photo of Senator Osten testifying.

John Beauregard, Senator Osten and Nancy Cowser testify in support of a bill to bring more job-training funds to southeastern Connecticut.

State Senator Cathy Osten (D-Sprague) and job advocates from southeastern Connecticut testified today in support of a bill which Sen. Osten helped craft and which would expand existing job-training programs in southeastern Connecticut to prepare workers for new careers in defense manufacturing and to re-train those who have lost a job in the gaming industry.

Senate Bill 731, “An Act Concerning Resources for Advanced Manufacturing and Health Care Training Programs in Eastern Connecticut,” received its public hearing today before the Commerce Committee.

The bill is based on more than a year of roundtable business discussions that Sen. Osten held in southeastern Connecticut, linking private-sector business owners with community college officials, economic development leaders, state officials and others to grow jobs in southeastern Connecticut.

“We can open new opportunities for different careers for those who have lost their jobs in the gaming industry as well as fill the pipeline for defense manufacturing-related jobs,” Sen. Osten told the committee. “As we know, not everyone is prepared for a traditional four-year college education. With the legislature’s previous support for Electric Boat, UTC/Pratt & Whitney, and most recently Sikorsky, and with the growth of manufacturing jobs in the coming years, we must lay the groundwork today to prepare our workforce for the jobs of tomorrow.”

Sen. Osten said her bill seeks $1.5 million in state funding to replace some federal jobs-training funding in the area that is ending, but which has proven successful, creating 600 to 800 jobs per year at Electric Boat alone. Sen. Osten said she hopes her bill could create another 1,000 to 1,500 new jobs in southeastern Connecticut over the next two years.

John Beauregard, president of the Eastern Connecticut Workforce Investment Board, also testified in support of SB 731, saying the bill would be “transformative” for the region.

“One of the key points that I have heard from legislators in various meetings is a desire to solve both Connecticut’s immediate budgetary issues as well as build a strategy for the long-term prosperity of the state. They have repeatedly emphasized an ideal to prioritize investment toward programs with a proven track record of both financial return and profound social impact. I am proud to represent my region to present one such program to you today,” Beauregard said. “In some ways, I feel like together we have been cast in an episode of the entrepreneurial hit show ‘The Shark Tank’ for today’s meeting. Our role is to present an innovative and proven idea to you with the understanding that your role is to review the proposal in the context of its redeeming value for the state’s bottom line. I believe our proposal, the Eastern Connecticut Manufacturing Pipeline Initiative, has proven its ability to both improve our state budget situation and to provide career opportunities for our residents to stay and flourish here in Connecticut.”

Beauregard noted that in 2015, the Pipeline Initiative received a $6 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor, one of only six such grants in the country. The Pipeline used a short-term (6-10 weeks) customized training program to align jobseekers with the specific hiring needs of area employers; the result was more than 200 job placements in 10 months.

Nancy Cowser, executive director of the Southeastern Connecticut Enterprise Region, said she is confident that Connecticut will see a “significant” return on its investment if funding for these training programs is approved.

“As you well know, our region has lagged much of the nation in recovering from the great recession. But we stand poised to take advantage of significant workforce development opportunities in advanced manufacturing and healthcare,” Cowser said. “But those jobs, employees, taxpayers, homeowners, renters and local spenders will only become a reality if our region can continuously demonstrate to major employers that we are ready to fill their needs. I sit here beside our partners because this opportunity is about collaborating and leveraging precious job-creation funds to ensure that as a region, we are a place that the talented staff we have invested in want to stay—that education, culture, recreational opportunities, attractive housing, transportation—all those things that make a thriving community—are aligned.”

The Commerce Committee’s deadline for making favorable recommendations on bills is March 21.

Sen. Moore E-news: Free Personal Finance Workshop in Bridgeport

Senator Hartley Named Co-Chair of the Bipartisan Manufacturing Caucus

Senator Hartley Named Co-Chair of the Bipartisan Manufacturing Caucus

Caucus works to promote legislation that supports Connecticut’s manufacturing sector

This week, Senator Joan Hartley (D-Waterbury) was named Co-Chair of the General Assembly’s bipartisan Manufacturing Caucus. Legislators on the Manufacturing Caucus work to identify, craft and lead passage of legislation that promotes a strong, growing manufacturing sector in Connecticut’s economy.

“Connecticut is a state known for making things, particularly in our aerospace parts manufacturing sector,” said Senator Hartley. “Manufacturing is a critical part of our economy, creating good-paying jobs for state residents and supplying parts and products to the broader business community. By working with like-minded legislators on both sides of the aisle, I plan to advocate for policies that will strengthen and expand manufacturing in our state.”

Every year the Manufacturing Caucus identifies and recommends passage of legislation. As Co-Chair of the caucus, Hartley would be tasked with delivering these recommendations to the General Assembly and organizing caucus members to work for the passage of recommended bills.

As Co-Chair of the Commerce Committee, Senator Hartley is uniquely positioned to pass bills encouraging job growth in manufacturing and other sectors of the state economy. In recent years she has led passage of legislation that lowers the regulatory burden placed on small businesses and provides funding for new and growing companies.