Statement From Senate President Pro Tempore Looney Regarding Today’s Consensus Revenue Report

Statement From Senate President Pro Tempore Looney Regarding Today’s Consensus Revenue Report

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven) today released the following statement regarding the April 30, 2018 consensus revenue report:

“The consensus revenue report is certainly very welcome news for Connecticut’s budget. The reforms adopted as part of the bipartisan budget will lead to more than $1.5 billion being deposited into the state’s Rainy Day Fund and a stronger, more stable economic outlook. Now that we have the consensus revenue report, I look forward to working with my Democratic and Republican colleagues on making adjustments to the bipartisan budget in order to better fund public education, protect aid to cities and towns, and end the year with a balanced budget.”

Senate President Pro Tempore Looney Appoints Senator Marilyn Moore as the Senate Co-chair of the Bonding Subcommittee

Senate President Pro Tempore Looney Appoints Senator Marilyn Moore as the Senate Co-chair of the Bonding Subcommittee

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven) today announced that he has appointed Senator Marilyn Moore (D-Bridgeport) as the Senate Democratic co-chair of the General Assembly’s Bonding Subcommittee.

“Senator Moore’s constituents know her as a tireless advocate as well as a champion for community justice, women’s rights and equality,” said Senator Looney. “In the Senate, Senator Moore always conducts herself with the highest integrity and is counted on by her colleagues for her keen policy analysis and that is why I am pleased to appoint Senator Moore as co-chair of the Bonding Subcommittee. The Senate Democratic Caucus and the people of Connecticut will benefit from her thoughtful leadership of this the critically important subcommittee.”

Senator Moore succeeds Senator John Fonfara (D-Hartford) as the subcommittee’s Democratic Senate co-chair.

Senators Osten and Somers, Local Unions Rally Against Closure of Carpentry Program at Ella Grasso Tech

Senators Osten and Somers, Local Unions Rally Against Closure of Carpentry Program at Ella Grasso Tech

photo of Senator Osten.

State Senators Cathy Osten (D-Sprague) and Heather Somers (R-Groton) joined Carpenters Local 326 today to protest the end of the carpentry program at the Ella T. Grasso Technical High School in Groton.

Sen. Osten, who spoke out against the carpentry program closure when it was first announced in November 2015 by the Connecticut Technical High School System, believes carpentry and other building trades are going to fuel explosive job growth in the state and the region over the next several decades as manufacturers and subcontractors take on new defense contract work.

“The decision to end the carpentry program at Grasso Tech was made more than two years ago by a superintendent who has since resigned. Obviously a lot has changed since then, particularly Electric Boat’s announcement that it’s going to be building a dozen new submarines over the next 20 years and that they need to hire nearly 20,000 skilled tradespeople, including carpenters,” said Sen. Osten.

“We should reinstate a commercial carpentry program at Grasso Tech, not only for EB but for all the subcontractors and manufacturers in southeastern Connecticut. The need for carpenters is expected to grow nearly 10 percent over the next decade, and these jobs pay an average $50,000 a year with a high school apprenticeship. I’ll be working up in Hartford with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to create a state budget that adds money back for more student seats in our technical high school system,” she said.

“At the end of the day, the school administration is taking opportunity away from our local kids,” said Chris Bachant, Business Representative for Carpenters Local 326. “Carpenters craft bridges, foundations, flooring, framing, exterior siding—and that is just scratching the surface of the work we do. With the amount of opportunity that is coming to Eastern Connecticut it is reckless and foolish to get rid of the carpentry program. In fact, many carpenters are nearing retirement so it’s absolutely essential to foster a skilled workforce to fill these job vacancies, and fill vacancies with a workforce that has been trained with new technology. Local carpenters strongly oppose the closure of the carpentry program and want to thank everyone who came out today and supported our cause.”

“With the changing economic climate in southeastern Connecticut it is critically important to maintain the flow of workforce-ready students to fill job openings,” said Sen. Somers. “The fact that the school administration wants to close the carpentry program, when carpentry jobs are in high demand in southeastern Connecticut, is absurd and frankly irresponsible. We have a chance to stop this by offering our next generation good-paying jobs right here in southeastern Connecticut. I will continue to fight to make sure that our children have the training and skills they need to get the jobs they want and deserve.”

Looney E-News: Late April Update

Senator Winfield E-News: A Dream Come True

Senator Bye E-News: A Dream Come True

Senator Duff E-News: Celebrating Norwalk Day; Humane Legislator Award

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

The Democratic co-chairs of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee and two other Democratic senators today blasted legislative Republicans for once again taking a party-line stance against a bill that would increase democracy and voter participation on Connecticut’s college campuses, saying Republicans are willing to vote against more public participation in the election process because they may fear those college-age voters will cast their votes for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

The criticism by Higher Education committee Co-Chairs Senator Beth Bye (D-West Hartford) and Rep. Gregg Haddad (D-Mansfield) came after Republican legislators cast their second party-line vote in a month against House Bill 5420, “AN ACT REQUIRING ADDITIONAL POLLING PLACES AT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION DURING STATE ELECTIONS,” which would require cities and towns to create a separate voting district on the campus of any public or private college or university in Connecticut enrolling more than 3,000 students.

On March 23, all eight Republican members of the Government Administration and Elections Committee voted against the bill; today, all eight Republican members of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee voted against the bill. Democrats on both committees unanimously supported the bill.

“How many times have we heard members of both political parties say that voting is a fundamental right, something guaranteed us by our forefathers and defended in war, and yet many college students living in Connecticut for most of the year are effectively denied the opportunity to vote because they don’t have reasonable access to a voting booth,” Sen. Bye said. “We should make voting as easy as possible for everyone—Democrats, Republicans, unaffiliated voters, college-age students, working people, the elderly, everyone.”

“We should be doing everything possible in Connecticut to increase voter participation and to make it easier for everyone to vote in elections. This bill is one way we can do that; it’s an easy path to ensuring that college-age students in Connecticut can exercise the rights and freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution,” Rep. Haddad said. “Why Republicans would oppose this bill is baffling.”

“Access to the ballot box is a fundamental American right,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), who testified in support of the bill at its public hearing. “With our democracy threatened by forces both foreign and domestic, ensuring that our college students are able to cast their vote is critical to our civic health. Establishing polling places on college campuses will enhance civic engagement among our future leaders.”

“Eager to vote—many for the first time—Connecticut college students, especially those who live on campus, face several challenges when trying to cast a ballot,” said state Senator Marilyn Moore (D-Bridgeport), who co-sponsored the bill. “I represent students from Sacred Heart University and the University of Bridgeport, and many of us can remember what it’s like for them: attending classes in the morning and evening, cramming in some study time before the library closed, going to a part-time job in-between—it’s one of the busiest times of our lives. Then Election Day comes and thousands of students don’t have time to submit an absentee ballot or make it off campus to vote. This has a detrimental effect on the health of our democracy. We should be making it easier for students to participate in electing those who represent them, but Republicans want to ensure that the voices of our young people continue to be unheard.”

The Connecticut Republican opposition to college student voting comes on the heels of the Connecticut Republican Party’s nearly unanimous opposition last week in the House of Representatives to an “early voting” resolution calling for a referendum on a constitutional amendment to allow early voting in Connecticut. Just three House Republicans joined with 78 Democrats to support a bill that is already in effect in 37 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Regarding college-age voting trends, according to a November 2016 Pew Research Center report on political party affiliation among American voters, in 1992, 49 percent of college graduates identified as Republican while 45 percent identified as Democrat. That political party identification has since changed, with 53 percent of college students identifying in 2016 as Democrat compared with 41 percent identifying as Republican. But among white college voters in 2016, party affiliation is evenly split: 46 percent Republican, 45 percent Democrat.

A September 2017 study by Tufts University’s Tisch College found that 48 percent of college-age students voted in the 2016 presidential election, far lower than the overall 60.2 percent voter turnout. Other reports suggest that mid-term elections (non-presidential election years) usually only attract about 14 percent of college-age voters—about one out of every seven students.

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

The Democratic co-chairs of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee and two other Democratic senators today blasted legislative Republicans for once again taking a party-line stance against a bill that would increase democracy and voter participation on Connecticut’s college campuses, saying Republicans are willing to vote against more public participation in the election process because they may fear those college-age voters will cast their votes for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

The criticism by Higher Education committee Co-Chairs Senator Beth Bye (D-West Hartford) and Rep. Gregg Haddad (D-Mansfield) came after Republican legislators cast their second party-line vote in a month against House Bill 5420, “AN ACT REQUIRING ADDITIONAL POLLING PLACES AT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION DURING STATE ELECTIONS,” which would require cities and towns to create a separate voting district on the campus of any public or private college or university in Connecticut enrolling more than 3,000 students.

On March 23, all eight Republican members of the Government Administration and Elections Committee voted against the bill; today, all eight Republican members of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee voted against the bill. Democrats on both committees unanimously supported the bill.

“How many times have we heard members of both political parties say that voting is a fundamental right, something guaranteed us by our forefathers and defended in war, and yet many college students living in Connecticut for most of the year are effectively denied the opportunity to vote because they don’t have reasonable access to a voting booth,” Sen. Bye said. “We should make voting as easy as possible for everyone—Democrats, Republicans, unaffiliated voters, college-age students, working people, the elderly, everyone.”

“We should be doing everything possible in Connecticut to increase voter participation and to make it easier for everyone to vote in elections. This bill is one way we can do that; it’s an easy path to ensuring that college-age students in Connecticut can exercise the rights and freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution,” Rep. Haddad said. “Why Republicans would oppose this bill is baffling.”

“Access to the ballot box is a fundamental American right,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), who testified in support of the bill at its public hearing. “With our democracy threatened by forces both foreign and domestic, ensuring that our college students are able to cast their vote is critical to our civic health. Establishing polling places on college campuses will enhance civic engagement among our future leaders.”

“Eager to vote—many for the first time—Connecticut college students, especially those who live on campus, face several challenges when trying to cast a ballot,” said state Senator Marilyn Moore (D-Bridgeport), who co-sponsored the bill. “I represent students from Sacred Heart University and the University of Bridgeport, and many of us can remember what it’s like for them: attending classes in the morning and evening, cramming in some study time before the library closed, going to a part-time job in-between—it’s one of the busiest times of our lives. Then Election Day comes and thousands of students don’t have time to submit an absentee ballot or make it off campus to vote. This has a detrimental effect on the health of our democracy. We should be making it easier for students to participate in electing those who represent them, but Republicans want to ensure that the voices of our young people continue to be unheard.”

The Connecticut Republican opposition to college student voting comes on the heels of the Connecticut Republican Party’s nearly unanimous opposition last week in the House of Representatives to an “early voting” resolution calling for a referendum on a constitutional amendment to allow early voting in Connecticut. Just three House Republicans joined with 78 Democrats to support a bill that is already in effect in 37 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Regarding college-age voting trends, according to a November 2016 Pew Research Center report on political party affiliation among American voters, in 1992, 49 percent of college graduates identified as Republican while 45 percent identified as Democrat. That political party identification has since changed, with 53 percent of college students identifying in 2016 as Democrat compared with 41 percent identifying as Republican. But among white college voters in 2016, party affiliation is evenly split: 46 percent Republican, 45 percent Democrat.

A September 2017 study by Tufts University’s Tisch College found that 48 percent of college-age students voted in the 2016 presidential election, far lower than the overall 60.2 percent voter turnout. Other reports suggest that mid-term elections (non-presidential election years) usually only attract about 14 percent of college-age voters—about one out of every seven students.

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

Committee Leaders, Senators Looney and Moore Criticize Republicans for Opposing Bill to Increase Democracy

The Democratic co-chairs of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee and two other Democratic senators today blasted legislative Republicans for once again taking a party-line stance against a bill that would increase democracy and voter participation on Connecticut’s college campuses, saying Republicans are willing to vote against more public participation in the election process because they may fear those college-age voters will cast their votes for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

The criticism by Higher Education committee Co-Chairs Senator Beth Bye (D-West Hartford) and Rep. Gregg Haddad (D-Mansfield) came after Republican legislators cast their second party-line vote in a month against House Bill 5420, “AN ACT REQUIRING ADDITIONAL POLLING PLACES AT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION DURING STATE ELECTIONS,” which would require cities and towns to create a separate voting district on the campus of any public or private college or university in Connecticut enrolling more than 3,000 students.

On March 23, all eight Republican members of the Government Administration and Elections Committee voted against the bill; today, all eight Republican members of the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee voted against the bill. Democrats on both committees unanimously supported the bill.

“How many times have we heard members of both political parties say that voting is a fundamental right, something guaranteed us by our forefathers and defended in war, and yet many college students living in Connecticut for most of the year are effectively denied the opportunity to vote because they don’t have reasonable access to a voting booth,” Sen. Bye said. “We should make voting as easy as possible for everyone—Democrats, Republicans, unaffiliated voters, college-age students, working people, the elderly, everyone.”

“We should be doing everything possible in Connecticut to increase voter participation and to make it easier for everyone to vote in elections. This bill is one way we can do that; it’s an easy path to ensuring that college-age students in Connecticut can exercise the rights and freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution,” Rep. Haddad said. “Why Republicans would oppose this bill is baffling.”

“Access to the ballot box is a fundamental American right,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), who testified in support of the bill at its public hearing. “With our democracy threatened by forces both foreign and domestic, ensuring that our college students are able to cast their vote is critical to our civic health. Establishing polling places on college campuses will enhance civic engagement among our future leaders.”

“Eager to vote—many for the first time—Connecticut college students, especially those who live on campus, face several challenges when trying to cast a ballot,” said state Senator Marilyn Moore (D-Bridgeport), who co-sponsored the bill. “I represent students from Sacred Heart University and the University of Bridgeport, and many of us can remember what it’s like for them: attending classes in the morning and evening, cramming in some study time before the library closed, going to a part-time job in-between—it’s one of the busiest times of our lives. Then Election Day comes and thousands of students don’t have time to submit an absentee ballot or make it off campus to vote. This has a detrimental effect on the health of our democracy. We should be making it easier for students to participate in electing those who represent them, but Republicans want to ensure that the voices of our young people continue to be unheard.”

The Connecticut Republican opposition to college student voting comes on the heels of the Connecticut Republican Party’s nearly unanimous opposition last week in the House of Representatives to an “early voting” resolution calling for a referendum on a constitutional amendment to allow early voting in Connecticut. Just three House Republicans joined with 78 Democrats to support a bill that is already in effect in 37 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Regarding college-age voting trends, according to a November 2016 Pew Research Center report on political party affiliation among American voters, in 1992, 49 percent of college graduates identified as Republican while 45 percent identified as Democrat. That political party identification has since changed, with 53 percent of college students identifying in 2016 as Democrat compared with 41 percent identifying as Republican. But among white college voters in 2016, party affiliation is evenly split: 46 percent Republican, 45 percent Democrat.

A September 2017 study by Tufts University’s Tisch College found that 48 percent of college-age students voted in the 2016 presidential election, far lower than the overall 60.2 percent voter turnout. Other reports suggest that mid-term elections (non-presidential election years) usually only attract about 14 percent of college-age voters—about one out of every seven students.