Senator Flexer Blasts Family Institute

Senator Flexer Blasts Family Institute

Senator Mae Flexer (D-Danielson) responded today to the Family Institute of Connecticut’s (FIC) request for an apology regarding her recent remarks about Vice President Mike Pence during a news conference about Sexual Assault Awareness Month.

In a blog post, the FIC implored its members to contact Senator Flexer to request a retraction of her remarks in which she “ . . . publicly accused Vice President Mike Pence of ‘perpetuating rape culture!”’ and urging them to call on her to apologize to the Vice President. In a Washington Post profile about his wife, it was detailed that Pence will not eat dinner alone with a woman unless his wife attends, and will not attend events where alcohol is served unless she is by his side. While a Congressman, Pence would not have one-on-one closed door meetings with his female staffers—a policy that did not apply to male staff members.

“I am deeply concerned that at an event meant to highlight our commitment to combatting sexual assault, the Family Institute’s only takeaway was to defend the perpetuation of Rape Culture and misogyny at the highest levels of our government—and then demand an apology to the man who is practicing this type of behavior. Once again when a woman speaks up for her right to fair and equal treatment the FIC responds by trying to shout her down. I will not be shouted down,” said Sen. Flexer.

“I am also disappointed that once again, the FIC isn’t joining the conversation, but instead continuing their tradition of ugly attacks and fighting against the fair treatment of men and women in Connecticut. This is a group that compared gay marriage to a salad bar and lobbies against science-based health information for students, so we should not be surprised that they go on the defensive about Sexual Assault Awareness Month.

“I certainly will not apologize for condemning anyone who perpetuates Rape Culture, especially not the Vice President, who should be held to a higher standard. Vice President Pence should be the one to apologize for practicing blatant discrimination and normalizing the idea that men can’t control their urges enough to be alone in the company of women while dining or anywhere else. If the male co-chairs of my legislative committees followed the Vice President’s policy, I would not be able to meet privately with them to discuss important legislative issues. That is, for lack of a better word, outrageous.

“This is an insult to the women in the employ of a man who refuses to treat female staffers in the same manner he does male staffers. It is preposterous to defend a practice born out of a man’s supposed lack of control around women. There’s a phrase for that, and that phrase is ‘Rape Culture.’ Women should not be excluded from the table—literally or figuratively, for that matter—because a man feels like he can’t separate sex from workplace professionalism. Frankly, the fact that the Vice President feels he needs to impose such strict rules upon himself, so as to not act on what must be very strong impulses, is as confounding as it is disturbing in 2017.

“For an organization that calls itself the Family Institute of Connecticut, it seems to have very little regard for women of the household and the way our country’s Vice President views and treats them. They say they are for families, but refuse to recognize or accept the LBGTQ community and don’t believe that women should be in charge of their own reproductive rights, family planning, or their own bodies. Families are about inclusion. They are about looking out for each other, taking care of one another, loving each other because of and in spite of differences. The FIC is about exclusion; fighting against the rights of women and loving gay couples, to name two examples.

“We must hold the leaders of the Republican Party—including Mr. Pence—to the same standards as we do anyone else. There is no place for this type of disrespect for women in our culture, and certainly not in the highest offices of the land.

“I encourage members of the FIC to read a very thorough Southern Connecticut State University report on Rape Culture and the hallmarks of it so they can better understand what they so vociferously endorse about Mr. Pence.”

“Once he has been better educated on this crucial topic, I would be happy to bring Mr. Wolfgang back to the table to discuss issues of importance—that is, if we are able to sit alone at a table together.”

Sen. Moore E-news: Promoting Racial Equity and Food Justice; Safe Havens for Parents and Newborns

Senator Winfield in the News: Connecticut bill to curb use of solitary confinement progresses

Connecticut bill to curb use of solitary confinement progresses

The bill has been championed by Sen. Gary Winfield, D-New Haven, who in March spent two hours in a replica-like solitary cell to experience the feeling of isolated confinement.

“We are concerned about the effects of isolated confinement on the individuals we place in isolated confinement,” Winfield said. But those concerns don’t just end with the inmates.

Read the full article at the New Haven Register.

Duff and Democrats Respond Following Repeal of Internet Privacy Protections by President Trump and Congressional Republicans

Duff and Democrats Respond Following Repeal of Internet Privacy Protections by President Trump and Congressional Republicans

With millions of Connecticut consumers and residents in danger of having their personal information about their web browsing history, children, health, finances and location collected and sold, Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) today announced his proposal to protect internet users.

Senator Duff’s proposal follows Republicans in Congress passing a measure—signed into law by President Donald J. Trump—that repeals a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) privacy rules adopted in October requiring Internet Service Providers to get customers’ permission to use and share. The Obama era rule also required ISPs to adopt security practices to help prevent large-scale data breaches, and to notify users, the FCC and the FBI in case of a major hack.

“President Trump and the Republicans in Congress are perpetrating this gross and outrageous invasion of peoples’ privacy,” said Senator Duff. “The Republican rollback of FCC privacy rules could mean that your personal information is auctioned off to highest bidder without your knowledge. That’s wrong and this proposal will help protect Connecticut residents.”

Senator Duff and Senator Joan Hartley (D-Waterbury) will introduce a legislative amendment barring any telecommunications company, certified telecommunications provider, certified competitive video service provider or internet service provider from providing its services to a customer on the grounds that the customer has not approved collection of the customer’s personal information.

“Congress thinks the American people aren’t paying attention—but they couldn’t be more wrong. Their disregard for internet privacy is embarrassing and indecent. And I look forward to working with Senator Duff and other colleagues to take strong action in Connecticut,” Rep. Matthew Lesser (D-Middletown) said.

Hartley, Duff and Democrats Respond Following Repeal of Internet Privacy Protections by President Trump and Congressional Republicans

Hartley, Duff and Democrats Respond Following Repeal of Internet Privacy Protections by President Trump and Congressional Republicans

With millions of Connecticut consumers and residents in danger of having their personal information about their web browsing history, children, health, finances and location collected and sold, Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) today announced his proposal to protect internet users.

Senator Duff’s proposal follows Republicans in Congress passing a measure—signed into law by President Donald J. Trump—that repeals a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) privacy rules adopted in October requiring Internet Service Providers to get customers’ permission to use and share. The Obama era rule also required ISPs to adopt security practices to help prevent large-scale data breaches, and to notify users, the FCC and the FBI in case of a major hack.

“President Trump and the Republicans in Congress are perpetrating this gross and outrageous invasion of peoples’ privacy,” said Senator Duff. “The Republican rollback of FCC privacy rules could mean that your personal information is auctioned off to highest bidder without your knowledge. That’s wrong and this proposal will help protect Connecticut residents.”

Senator Duff and Senator Joan Hartley (D-Waterbury) will introduce a legislative amendment barring any telecommunications company, certified telecommunications provider, certified competitive video service provider or internet service provider from providing its services to a customer on the grounds that the customer has not approved collection of the customer’s personal information.

“Congress thinks the American people aren’t paying attention—but they couldn’t be more wrong. Their disregard for internet privacy is embarrassing and indecent. And I look forward to working with Senator Duff and other colleagues to take strong action in Connecticut,” Rep. Matthew Lesser (D-Middletown) said.

Senator Winfield E-News: Free Dental Care!

Sen. Gerratana E-news: CT Domestic Violence Support Providers; Supporting Connecticut’s State Colleges

Senator Osten E-News: Let Them Work, Let Them Live; Latino Business Chamber; National Prescription Drug Take Back

Senate President Looney Hails Judiciary Committee’s Bipartisan Passage of Strongest Anti-Hate Crimes Legislation in the Nation

Senate President Looney Hails Judiciary Committee’s Bipartisan Passage of Strongest Anti-Hate Crimes Legislation in the Nation

Senate President Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven) today hailed the Judiciary Committee’s bipartisan approval of a comprehensive proposal to strengthen Connecticut’s hate crime laws making them the strongest in the nation.

In recent months, incidents of hate including murders, assaults, bomb threats and vandalism have been directed against African-Americans, Hindu-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, Muslims, Sikh- Americans, transgender women and others in Connecticut and across America.

“Today’s vote in the Judiciary Committee sends a strong message that hate crimes and bigotry have no place in Connecticut,” said Senator Looney. “Our hate crimes proposal will make Connecticut the national leader in the fight against these despicable acts, and it will serve as a model for other states looking to combat hate crimes based on bigotry and bias. I am pleased that the Republicans joined in supporting this Democratic proposal.”

Connecticut’s proposal:

  • Strengthens hate crime laws by increasing penalties, making it a felony (instead of a misdemeanor) for committing a hate crime against a group of persons (instead of a specific individual.)
  • Strengthens and modernizes Connecticut’s hate crime laws to include hate crimes based on gender (sex). Current law protects only “gender identity or expression,” not gender.
  • Strengthens hate crime laws by increasing the penalty to a Class C felony (from a Class D felony) for making a bomb threat or other threat of violence against a house of worship, religious community center or other religious institution—or any daycare facility—if the threat is made with the intent to terrorize another person or to cause the evacuation of the building or grounds. This puts the penalty for such bomb threats on par with threats made against schools.
  • Strengthens hate crime laws by increasing the penalty for desecrating any house of worship or any religious cemetery from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class C felony if there is more than $10,000 in damage, or a Class D felony if there is less than $10,000 in damage.
  • Strengthens hate crime laws by expanding the threshold for a 1st-degree hate crime from its current requirement of causing “serious physical injury” to instead causing “physical injury.”
  • Strengthens hate crime laws by punishing attempts to commit them, by including in the 2nd-degree hate crime statute attempts to damage, destroy or deface property.
  • Establishes a court’s power to order extensive, relevant community service and/or restitution, in addition to any other penalties imposed for hate crime convictions.
  • Establishes a mandatory minimum fine of $1,000 for individuals convicted of hate crimes, and requires such fines to be deposited into a fund for anti-hate crime education initiatives.
  • Creates a state-wide Hate Crimes Advisory Council.
  • Creates and publicizes a hate crimes hot line and a text line for reporting incidents of harassment or intimidation of minority groups in the state.
  • Allows an employee to take up to 16 hours of job-protected leave in one year if the employee has to leave work due to an evacuation of his or her child’s school or day care facility.