Study: Red Flag Laws, Originated in Connecticut, Effective in Preventing Suicides

Study: Red Flag Laws, Originated in Connecticut, Effective in Preventing Suicides

By Lawrence Cook
December 18 @ 5:00 am

Credit: FotoDuets / Canva

 

A recent study has found that risk protection orders – those so-called ‘Red Flag’ laws that temporarily remove firearms from a person who may be a danger to themselves or others – can be an effective and important suicide prevention tool.

Connecticut enacted the country’s first Red Flag law in 1999 following a devastating mass shooting at the Connecticut Lottery. The law established a legal procedure for police and attorneys for the temporary court-ordered removal of firearms from a person who may pose a danger to themselves or others.

Legislative Democrats led a 2021 update of law to allow family or household members, as well as certain medical professionals, to also apply for a risk protection order.

Since 1999, approximately 5,800 risk protection orders have been issued in Connecticut, and, according to a 2016 study by researchers at Yale, Duke, and the University of Connecticut, it is estimated that in the first 17 years of its existence, the Red Flag law has saved between 32 and 76 lives from suicide with a firearm.

State Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, said Red Flag laws have become a proven and popular method of preventing self-harm and harm to others.

“I’m proud that Connecticut was the first state in the nation to enact this law, and that we’ve updated it since to protect even more lives,” Duff said. “About 20 other states have followed our lead, too.”

A recent Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law study found that more than 800,000 lives have been lost to suicide in the United States in the past two decades, over half of them resulting from self-inflicted firearm injuries, and that “interventions that can effectively keep guns out of the hands of people at imminent risk of harm to themselves or others should be a key component of an effective public health effort to reduce the number of these preventable tragedies.”

“To the extent that extreme risk protection orders can help ensure safety for individuals who pose a risk of intentional self-injury with a firearm, for whatever reason or motivation, these legal tools offer a versatile and promising intervention to prevent suicides,” the study found.

In Connecticut, a state’s attorney, assistant state’s attorney, police officer, family member or medical professional can apply to a court for a risk protection order if they believe that a person poses a risk of imminent personal injury to themself or someone else. Those orders are issued based on ‘probable cause,’ including:

-Recent threats or acts of violence directed towards self or others;

-Recent acts of cruelty to animals;

-Reckless use, display or brandishing of a firearm or other deadly weapon;

-A history of use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against others;

-Illegal use of controlled substances or abuse of alcohol; or

-Involuntary confinement to a hospital for persons with psychiatric disabilities.

Sen. Hartley Discusses Brownfields and Redevelopment Trends in DECD Panel

Sen. Hartley Discusses Brownfields and Redevelopment Trends in DECD Panel

Senator Joan Hartley discusses redevelopment trends and Brownfield funding alongside Dale Kroop, Bob Labanara, David Kooris and Karmen Cheung

Last week, State Senator Joan Hartley, Senate Chair of the Commerce Committee, participated in a panel hosted by the Department of Economic and Community Development (DECD) to discuss current market trends and their effects on brownfield redevelopment in Connecticut. She was joined by Karmen Cheung, Senior Developer, Pennrose, LLC, David Kooris, Executive Director, CT Municipal Redevelopment Authority (MRDA), Dale Kroop Founder and ED, New Colony Development Corporation and Bob Labanara, Business Development Manager, Gilbane Building Co. and the discussion was moderated by Deputy Commissioner Matt Pugliese.

In the last biennial budget, funding for Brownfield Remediation was increased from $50 million to $70 million and it is estimated that every $1 of state funding leverages $20 in private funding.

“Brownfield remediation is a fantastic example of how public private partnerships can clean blighted and contaminated properties and make way for powerful economic development opportunities,” said Sen. Hartley. “Today’s panel was a reminder of how much energy there is behind these development opportunities, and the real change they can make for municipalities and residents across Connecticut. This legislative session I look forward to continuing to improve these processes and invest in trade job training to ensure that when these projects are ready to get off the ground, there are skilled Connecticut workers ready to make it happen.”

As Chair of the Commerce Committee, Senator Hartley has led passage of a number of pieces of legislation to invest in and improve processes surrounding brownfield remediation and turning blighted properties into opportunities for economic development.

In the 2023 session Senator Hartley led passage of SB 1042 which allowed brownfield land banks to use state funds for operational costs and SB 1092 which allowed the land banks to enter agreements with regional councils of government.

After much collaboration between DECD, DEEP, environmental lawyers, developers and more on the Transfer Act Working Group, Senator Hartley led passage of legislation which implemented a released-base remediation program for real estate transfers.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Garnet McLaughlin | Garnet.McLaughlin@cga.ct.gov | 860-304-2319

Senator Rahman Applauds Funding for Farm-to-School Program in Andover and Coventry

Senator Rahman Applauds Funding for Farm-to-School Program in Andover and Coventry

Sen. MD Rahman, D-Manchester, welcomed the state Department of Agriculture’s release of $75,000 to support the Coventry and Andover School Nutrition Services’ Farm to School 3Cs Integration program.

The grant will support the regional farm-to-school initiative, which includes five school cafeterias and provides students with opportunities to learn about their food systems through hands-on experiences with growing food and taking ownership over what they eat at home and in school.

“Local farms are a vital part of our communities so it is great to see this investment in a program that teaches young people about the value of locally grown food and healthy eating habits,” said Senator Rahman, whose district includes Andover as well as Bolton, Glastonbury, and Manchester. “This grant forges an essential link between education and local agriculture and reinforces for the next generation why support for our farming community matters.”

The Coventry and Andover program was one of 15 projects selected by the state Agriculture Department to receive grants under the CT Grown for CT Kids, which provided school programs a total of $750,000 in fiscal year 2025.

CT Grown for CT Kids focuses on increasing availability of locally grown foods in child nutrition programs and teaches children about the importance of nutrition and farm-to-school connections.

“These awards are more than just a financial commitment – they are an investment in the future of our children, our health, our food systems, and the agriculture industry here in Connecticut,” said Agriculture Commissioner Bryan P. Hurlburt. “Awarded projects have ensured children have access to healthy, local CT Grown foods while gaining hands-on experience in helping grow food for their classmates and community. As we look to the future, these investments lay the groundwork for a healthier generation, a more resilient food supply, and a thriving agricultural community in Connecticut – all of which will benefit from sustained funding and continued support.”

Contact: Hugh McQuaid | Hugh.McQuaid@cga.ct.gov | 860-634-4651

New Partnership Erases Medical Debt for Thousands of Connecticut Residents

New Partnership Erases Medical Debt for Thousands of Connecticut Residents

By Hugh McQuaid
December 17 @ 5:00 am

Gov. Ned Lamont speaks at a press conference announcing the erasure of medical debt. Credit: Joe O’Leary / Senate Democrats

 

A new partnership between a national nonprofit organization and the state of Connecticut will reduce or eliminate medical debts owed by roughly 23,000 residents in the coming days, state officials announced Monday.

The group, Undue Medical Debt, has used public investments to negotiate with health care providers to eliminate bundles of medical debt owed by residents who fall under the income threshold of less than four times the federal poverty level or residents whose medical debt meets or exceeds 5% of their overall income, according to Gov. Ned Lamont’s office.

Allison Sesso, president and CEO of Undue Medical Debt, explained the process during a late morning press conference in the state Capitol’s Old Appropriations Room.

“It is not magic, it is the market,” Sesso said. “Basically there is a for-profit debt market in which you can buy medical debt for pennies on the dollar and the reason why you can buy it for pennies on the dollar is, unfortunately, the people who owe it really don’t have the money to pay it. Our health care system has unreasonable expectations about what people pay out of pocket based on their income ”

The first round of the initiative involved a state investment of around $100,000 in federal American Rescue Plan Act funds, which Undue Medical Debt has been able to use to negotiate and acquire roughly $30 million in medical debt owed by Connecticut residents.

“This is all about making sure that health care is more broadly available, accessible and affordable,” Lamont said. “We want to make sure that nobody — nobody is discouraged from getting the check up they need, the preventative care they need, and making sure that our amazing hospitals here in our state can take care of you.”

Sen. Saud Anwar, a South Windsor Democrat who serves as Senate chair of the legislature’s Public Health Committee, said his panel would seek to address the affordability of health care more broadly during the legislative session that begins next month.

“This is probably a trillion dollar question at the national level, if not more. The reality is in our legislative session this year, we started to look at what are the various things we can do. In this upcoming session we will be discussing some of these aspects,” Anwar said, including looking at insurance companies. “What are they doing that is increasing costs to consumers? Another component is ‘how can we prevent this?’”

Residents who will be benefiting from relief under the first round of the program will receive a letter from Undue Medical Debt, which will outline the debts that have been eliminated. These letters will be delivered through the U.S. mail beginning on Dec. 23, the governor’s office said.

Senator Gaston Welcomes Funding to Childhood Program in Stratford

Senator Gaston Welcomes Funding to Childhood Program in Stratford

Today, state Senator Herron Keyon Gaston (D-Bridgeport) is welcoming over $19,000 to an early childhood program in Stratford. The Connecticut Department of Agriculture (CT DoAg) has selected 15 projects total valued at more than $750,000 to receive funding through the Connecticut Grown for Connecticut Kids Grant (CTG4CTK Grant).

The CT DoAg is awarding $19,800 to Little Growers: Growing with Nature program at LR Legacy Trading LLC dba Lindsey’s House. Their Little Growers program is designed to bring hands-on gardening into their early childhood program, allowing children to grow herbs, perennials, and annual fruits to supply fresh produce for classroom meals and snacks throughout the year.

“I am happy to see such an incredible program receive funding in Stratford,” said Sen. Gaston. “This will help to provide children with the opportunity to explore, learn, and connect with the environment. This support ensures that the next generation can experience the wonders of nature, fostering curiosity, creativity, and a lifelong love for the world around them.”

The CT Grown for CT Kids grant focuses on increasing the availability of local foods in child nutrition programs, allowing educators to use hands-on educational techniques to teach students about nutrition and farm-to-school connections, sustaining relationships with local farmers and producers, enriching the educational experience of students, improving the health of children in the state, and enhancing the state’s economy.

This highly competitive grant program received nearly 80 applications for the full grant award categories with funding requests exceeding $2 million.

Senators Looney, Duff & Maroney Sign onto Multi-State-Authored Artificial Intelligence Op-Ed

Senators Looney, Duff & Maroney Sign onto Multi-State-Authored Artificial Intelligence Op-Ed

Today, state Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney (D-New Haven), state Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) and state Senator James Maroney (D-Milford), signed on and published a multi-state authored op-ed pushing passage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) regulations. The article emphasizes the growing need for comprehensive legislation to address the ethical, social, and economic challenges posed by AI.

Senators Looney, Duff, and Maroney plan to introduce a bill this upcoming 2025 legislative session in Connecticut that will create regulations for AI in Connecticut. The bill will focus on transparency and accountability, and training Connecticut’s workforce to use artificial intelligence.

By signing this multi-state article, Senators Looney, Duff, and Maroney have reinforced their commitment to ensuring AI advancements are protected. All who signed will work together on legislation for 2025 and collaborate to identify potential solutions and share resources.

“Connecticut needs to require guidelines to ensure decisions are made fairly, accurately and transparently,” said Senator Looney. “Working together with legislators from other states, we can create a framework to help mitigate the risks associated with Artificial Intelligence.”

“By bringing together policymakers, we can ensure a well-rounded approach to identifying and reducing potential risks brought upon by Artificial Intelligence,” said Senator Duff. “Knowledge-sharing allows for the development of comprehensive solutions. We must be proactive, so AI does not negatively impact us unknowingly before it is too late.”

“I am proud to sign on to this piece as it addresses the urgent need for legislative action surrounding Artificial Intelligence around the Country,” said Senator Maroney. “This will help us establish guidelines and regulations that not only promote the safe use of AI but also anticipate future challenges. We will work hard this upcoming session to get this bill passed and institute guidelines for AI in Connecticut.”

The bi-partisan group of legislators include 62 lawmakers total from 32 states including: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin have all co-authored the op-ed. The article was published in the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

To view the article, click here.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Michelle Rappaport | Michelle.Rappaport@cga.ct.gov| 508-479-4969

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, December 16, 2024

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

HARTFORD – Senate President Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk), and state Senator James Maroney (D-Milford) announced today that they intend to introduce a new version of 2024’s Senate Bill 3, “An Act Concerning Consumer Protection,” when the General Assembly meets in January to begin the 2025 legislative session.

SB3 was a far-ranging consumer protection bill that included a prohibition on the purchase and use of Chinese or Russian-made drones by local and state agencies in Connecticut. The ban arose out of concerns that these foreign drones may purposefully, or inadvertently, expose Americans and their public safety agencies to various “cyber vulnerabilities,” such as capturing and storing sensitive details about America’s infrastructure (i.e. bridges and water treatment plants).

The bill has become even more relevant over the past month as reports have increased of unexplained, nighttime drone sightings along the East Coast.

At a mid-November National Conference of State Legislatures meeting at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, former Defense Secretary James Mattis was asked by Sen. Duff if Chinese-made drones should be banned for sale and use by state and federal agencies. Mattis’s response? “Absolutely.”

In October, the U.S. Defense Department added DJI — a major Chinese drone manufacturer — to its list of companies allegedly working with Beijing’s military. DJI is the world’s largest drone manufacturer, and it sells more than half of all the commercial drones available in America. That DOD policy followed a September vote in the U.S. House of Representatives to ban new DJI drones from operating in the United States.

The Senate Democrats’ Senate Bill 3 last session offered a host of pro-consumer legislation: affordable broadband internet access, ending deceptive fees, requiring net neutrality by internet service providers, regulating streaming service billing, and banning the purchase and use of some foreign-made drones in Connecticut after a particular date.

“Americans are in fear over a recent rise in drone sightings at night. Various guesses – from corporate research to foreign spying to an alien takeover of the planet – abound. The federal Department of Homeland Security’s explanation that a recent FAA change allowing drones to fly at night isn’t cutting it with a population that’s been fed eight years of Republican conspiracy theories about everything from national elections to local pizza parlors,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said.

“Now, some of the same Republicans who helped kill a Democratic bill earlier this year that would have prohibited state agencies from purchasing and using Russian and Chinese drones are claiming that they’re concerned about drones and are wondering how Connecticut would handle malicious drone activity in our own airspace,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said. “This is classic Connecticut Republican bait and switch: they’re vehemently opposed to something until the moment arrives when it appears that a Democratic public policy proposal would actually benefit Connecticut citizens. We can and should do better, and we can do better by debating and passing a new consumer protection bill in the upcoming session – including a ban on the purchase and use of Russian and Chinese drones by local and state agencies.”

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, December 16, 2024

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

HARTFORD – Senate President Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk), and state Senator James Maroney (D-Milford) announced today that they intend to introduce a new version of 2024’s Senate Bill 3, “An Act Concerning Consumer Protection,” when the General Assembly meets in January to begin the 2025 legislative session.

SB3 was a far-ranging consumer protection bill that included a prohibition on the purchase and use of Chinese or Russian-made drones by local and state agencies in Connecticut. The ban arose out of concerns that these foreign drones may purposefully, or inadvertently, expose Americans and their public safety agencies to various “cyber vulnerabilities,” such as capturing and storing sensitive details about America’s infrastructure (i.e. bridges and water treatment plants).

The bill has become even more relevant over the past month as reports have increased of unexplained, nighttime drone sightings along the East Coast.

At a mid-November National Conference of State Legislatures meeting at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, former Defense Secretary James Mattis was asked by Sen. Duff if Chinese-made drones should be banned for sale and use by state and federal agencies. Mattis’s response? “Absolutely.”

In October, the U.S. Defense Department added DJI — a major Chinese drone manufacturer — to its list of companies allegedly working with Beijing’s military. DJI is the world’s largest drone manufacturer, and it sells more than half of all the commercial drones available in America. That DOD policy followed a September vote in the U.S. House of Representatives to ban new DJI drones from operating in the United States.

The Senate Democrats’ Senate Bill 3 last session offered a host of pro-consumer legislation: affordable broadband internet access, ending deceptive fees, requiring net neutrality by internet service providers, regulating streaming service billing, and banning the purchase and use of some foreign-made drones in Connecticut after a particular date.

“Americans are in fear over a recent rise in drone sightings at night. Various guesses – from corporate research to foreign spying to an alien takeover of the planet – abound. The federal Department of Homeland Security’s explanation that a recent FAA change allowing drones to fly at night isn’t cutting it with a population that’s been fed eight years of Republican conspiracy theories about everything from national elections to local pizza parlors,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said.

“Now, some of the same Republicans who helped kill a Democratic bill earlier this year that would have prohibited state agencies from purchasing and using Russian and Chinese drones are claiming that they’re concerned about drones and are wondering how Connecticut would handle malicious drone activity in our own airspace,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said. “This is classic Connecticut Republican bait and switch: they’re vehemently opposed to something until the moment arrives when it appears that a Democratic public policy proposal would actually benefit Connecticut citizens. We can and should do better, and we can do better by debating and passing a new consumer protection bill in the upcoming session – including a ban on the purchase and use of Russian and Chinese drones by local and state agencies.”

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, December 16, 2024

SENS. LOONEY, DUFF AND MARONEY RESPONSE TO DRONE REPORTS: PASS SENATE BILL 3 IN 2025

HARTFORD – Senate President Martin M. Looney (D-New Haven), Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk), and state Senator James Maroney (D-Milford) announced today that they intend to introduce a new version of 2024’s Senate Bill 3, “An Act Concerning Consumer Protection,” when the General Assembly meets in January to begin the 2025 legislative session.

SB3 was a far-ranging consumer protection bill that included a prohibition on the purchase and use of Chinese or Russian-made drones by local and state agencies in Connecticut. The ban arose out of concerns that these foreign drones may purposefully, or inadvertently, expose Americans and their public safety agencies to various “cyber vulnerabilities,” such as capturing and storing sensitive details about America’s infrastructure (i.e. bridges and water treatment plants).

The bill has become even more relevant over the past month as reports have increased of unexplained, nighttime drone sightings along the East Coast.

At a mid-November National Conference of State Legislatures meeting at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, former Defense Secretary James Mattis was asked by Sen. Duff if Chinese-made drones should be banned for sale and use by state and federal agencies. Mattis’s response? “Absolutely.”

In October, the U.S. Defense Department added DJI — a major Chinese drone manufacturer — to its list of companies allegedly working with Beijing’s military. DJI is the world’s largest drone manufacturer, and it sells more than half of all the commercial drones available in America. That DOD policy followed a September vote in the U.S. House of Representatives to ban new DJI drones from operating in the United States.

The Senate Democrats’ Senate Bill 3 last session offered a host of pro-consumer legislation: affordable broadband internet access, ending deceptive fees, requiring net neutrality by internet service providers, regulating streaming service billing, and banning the purchase and use of some foreign-made drones in Connecticut after a particular date.

“Americans are in fear over a recent rise in drone sightings at night. Various guesses – from corporate research to foreign spying to an alien takeover of the planet – abound. The federal Department of Homeland Security’s explanation that a recent FAA change allowing drones to fly at night isn’t cutting it with a population that’s been fed eight years of Republican conspiracy theories about everything from national elections to local pizza parlors,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said.

“Now, some of the same Republicans who helped kill a Democratic bill earlier this year that would have prohibited state agencies from purchasing and using Russian and Chinese drones are claiming that they’re concerned about drones and are wondering how Connecticut would handle malicious drone activity in our own airspace,” Sens. Looney, Duff and Maroney said. “This is classic Connecticut Republican bait and switch: they’re vehemently opposed to something until the moment arrives when it appears that a Democratic public policy proposal would actually benefit Connecticut citizens. We can and should do better, and we can do better by debating and passing a new consumer protection bill in the upcoming session – including a ban on the purchase and use of Russian and Chinese drones by local and state agencies.”

As Vaccine Rates Drop Nationally, They’re Rising In Connecticut

As Vaccine Rates Drop Nationally, They’re Rising In Connecticut

By Joe O’Leary
December 16 @ 10:15 am

Credit: 89Stocker / Canva

 

Connecticut has seen vaccination rates climb even amid national turbulence related to vaccines and declining childhood immunization rates around the country, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In November, the Kaiser Family foundation found that vaccination rates were falling across the United States. The MMR vaccine, which provides protection against measles, mumps and rubella, has continued to see uptake decline. From 2019-2020 to 2023-2024, the number of states with more than 95% of students vaccinated fell from 20 to 11, while states with school vaccination rates under 90% rose from just three to 14.

On a state-by-state basis, data continued to show declines in childhood vaccinations with the DTaP, polio and varicella vaccines all falling from 95% to 93%. That’s below the commonly accepted threshold for those vaccines, where coverage of 95% helps prevent community transmission of diseases like measles, and represents more than 280,000 children nationwide who remain unprotected.

There’s a likely correlation between that decline in vaccination coverage and the CDC reporting that there had been 16 measles outbreaks, defined as three or more related cases, in the United States in 2024. Comparably, in 2023, there were just four outbreaks.

Complicating matters to improve vaccination rates is growing mistrust of the scientific breakthrough. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Trump administration’s current nominee to lead the federal Department of Health and Human Services, has publicly expressed hesitation about vaccines including the MMR vaccine.

Kennedy has been tied to a measles epidemic in American Samoa in 2019 where more than 80 children died from the disease; Kennedy visited American Samoa and discouraged childhood vaccination.

While vaccination rates are falling elsewhere, in Connecticut, they have risen. The Connecticut Department of Public Health recently published an update that found state kindergarteners’ uptake of the MMR vaccine was at 97.7%, a full four points ahead of the national average. It rose by 0.4% in the last year, and in the process, there was a 3% increase in individual schools with MMR vaccination rates at or above 95%.

This aligns with CDC data, which found Connecticut medical exemptions rose by 0.1% in 2024, while non-medical exemptions fell by 0.4%.

Why is Connecticut in such good standing compared to the rest of the country? It likely involves legislation put in place in 2021, spearheaded by Senate Democrats, to eliminate the nonmedical exemption to vaccinations, where the state was the sixth nationally to end such a policy, according to the Associated Press.

Children with existing nonmedical exemptions were allowed to preserve them, and medical exemptions to vaccinations are still allowed, but removing the exemption came after several years of declining vaccination rates combined with an increase in use of the nonmedical exemption.

A key aspect of the legislation came from the belief that parents opposed to vaccination would claim a nonmedical exemption on religious grounds, even if their religion did not oppose vaccination itself.

Before the ban, the nonmedical exemption’s use rose 25% in one year as overall coverage rates dropped, according to a Hartford Courant editorial published in 2019. Meanwhile, the American Bar Association said in 2022 that research found just the Dutch Reformed Church, Christian Scientists and four faith-healing organizations opposed vaccines theologically, and several of those religions allowed for vaccination on a case-by-case basis.

In 2021, State Sen. Saud Anwar, a South Windsor Democrat who now serves as Senate chair of the Public Health Committee, said that vaccines serve as an important safety net — both for the people who take them and for those who cannot receive them due to medical complications.

“We have seen in recent years, both statewide and nationally, the consequences of reduced vaccination rates; they lead to outbreaks of diseases we have previously controlled,” Anwar said.

The Connecticut Department of Health recommends families ensure their children receive protection against illnesses that can be prevented or protected against by vaccination. Vaccines are available at pharmacies and doctor’s offices statewide.